Welcome to the GNG site

Updated August 2015

GNG is not GNU.

Where does your DONATION to GNU end up?

Who gets compensated the most for free software in GNU? Not you, a hard worker.

About GNG

On this website you will find information on the scam known as Mr. Richard Stallman and the fallacious Free Software foundation.

Richard Stallman is a very talented and intelligent programmer, but he is seriously confused about freedom.


"Live cheaply," he said, offering some free advice. "Don't buy a house, a car or have children. The problem is they're expensive and you have to spend all your time making money to pay for them." --FSF's Richard Stallman

So my first goal was "source must be available and it must be free (as in beer)". Which my first copyright license reflects very directly. -- Linus Torvalds

It's not about Free Beer?

One of the main claims of Richard Stallman is that GNU software is not about "free beer" or "free cost", but about freedom in general. He (his entire organization) contradicts himself on his free software website several times when he claims free software is indeed something about money after all.

GPL Quote From Section 11:


Legally, GPL software is in fact free in cost, as it states right in the license. Not free as in freedom, free as in COST.

Stallman claims free software is not about free cost, but Stallman makes money a big issue on his websites. In some places he claims GNU users and programmers can make as much money as they want. Other places he claims free software is not about money and is about sharing with your communes that don't have money (see below screenshot, implying GNU software is about free cost after all!).

Free cost is in fact deeply tied into GNU software, but all GNU followers will deny it and pretend it is not about free cost at all. This contradiction is evidence of brainwashing, as anyone using logic can figure out that "free software" is tied to "cost" in many ways.

What is GNG?

GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.

Notice: as this is the official GNG website, we are not affiliated with the official GNG website! We are also not in affiliation with the GNG OS or GNG Foundation.

The GNG acronym is a joke acronym. Mostly only programmers understand recursive jokes like above.

Serious Content

This website contains some jokes like the GNG acronym. However, it contains important serious facts about GNU and FSF proving it is a dangerous modern cult like organization. It is not a violent organization or anything like that. It is a cult that brainwashes software programmers and users virally. GNU constantly contradicts itself. By contradicting itself, it confuses humanity and manipulates people. Sadly, the GNU followers don't even know they are confused - they are very sure about their philosophy. Followers pretty much listen to whatever Stallman has to say, and are overly protective of his obvious contradictions.

Using simple logic one can see Stallman's free software website is full of flaws and paradoxes. Programmers are good at logic, and yet for some reason, GNU followers are not using logic to read the free software foundation website. We (GNG) want to find out why GNU followers are so cultish and brainwashed. We want to demonstrate to you the contradictions using logic and evidence.

"GNG" is anyone who understands the contradictions and extreme flaws of GNU philosophy.

Alternative Free Software

As GNG is not GNU, the website for GNG operating systems can be found below: You can also check out other free operating systems such as Minix who felt a BSD like license was more appropriate. Or you can even look into closed source operating systems like Microsoft Windows (they give away certain copies free with the purchase of hardware, via their Bing program).

Technical Merits of Linux

We are not arguing Linux is technically inferior just because a religious like cult is behind the software.... it's still a unix like operating system and very powerful. i.e. you don't have to stop using GNU outright (it would be nice to), but just be aware of the cult behind it. If you are a corporation considering donating to GNU, beware of your donations and where they are going (you are supporting anti-logic and confusion galore).

In fact, Linus Torvalds is not really a hardcore cult member, he makes it clear that he released linux as free beer and doesn't fall for Stallman's nonsense. Linus still ended up releasing his software under GNU even though he wasn't a full cult member (he was only partly one). We're not attacking linux or Linus as much as we are attacking Stallman and GNU. Using GNU software is kind of like buying clothes from a religious second hand store if you are non religious. People still support religious organizations even if they disagree with the religion behind it. It's a compromise. Another example would be if a brain surgeon just happened to be the best one available, who was also a young earth creationist... would you still accept surgery from him if he was going to do the best job? Ideally you'd find one who wasn't a lunatic.. but in some cases we make compromises and give in.

Ideally we'd eventually find a way to stop supporting nonsense and funding it, but in the mean time some people still have to make compromises. Being aware of the cult like system behind it is important even if you still have to end up using GNU. You can also minimize your use of it if there are alternatives, but still use it where you have to. An analogy would be: if you were non religious and found a second hand store that sold stuff for the same price as the religious store, why support the religious based store? Why give the cult money? On the other hand if the religious store offers items at half price or better quality items many people would still go to the religious store. Or if there were way more religious stores on every block, you might go there for convenience. Similarily, linux is everywhere and anywhere - it's all over the place, whereas BSD is rare and hard to come by. GCC is also everywhere. It's likely Linux and GNU are taking over because of Argumentum ad populum, rather than sensible logic.

One has to consider though, if GNU users are brainwashed cult members that don't understand basic logic when it comes to reading websites (they read through Stallman's sites and don't see any paradoxes or contradictions, or outright lies), are they also missing some logic in their programs too, since logic is a general skill? I.e. does being a cult member mean that you are not as good of a programmer? Maybe. Sometimes religions inspire people to do wonderful things though (more often bad things, but sometimes good).. so there are two sides to the religion of GNU. Just because GNU inspires some fairly good software doesn't mean we should just pull the wool over our eyes and ignore the fact that it is a cult. It would be like someone joining a religious cult that does some good things for society, but ends up making the person lose their mind in the process; we should still fight the cult even if it does some good things. Ultimately, the cult would hopefully drop its nonsense and change to be more reasonable and no longer be a cult (this is unlikely to happen, but cult members of religions do become unbrainwashed, so it is possible).

The Problem

In short: GNU and FSF are a cult.

Where does your DONATION to GNU end up?

Who gets compensated the most for free software in GNU? Not you, a hard worker.

GNU and FSF is a contradicting and confusing mind game and legally troublesome scam.

All one has to do is read the GNU website, philosophy, and license.. and soon the skeptical reader will be twisting in his grave for hours trying to figure out what FREE means, according to one man - Richard Stallman. Had he only pulled out his dictionary, and realized he is not one. GnuTards are not skeptics.

Unfortunately, many people that fall for Stallmanism do not even know they are falling for Stallmanism.

Free: "Not under control or power of one another" -- dictionary
Once you release software under GPL, the GNU and FSF (and its members) own you and your code - you have given it up to the cult.
Free: "Not burdened by obligations" -- dictionary
Obligations, hey. How about the obligation to include long cult like licenses with your source code, with the mailing address of Stallman's donation center embedded into all your sources to make him and his lawyers famous and rich. How about the obligation to not charge money for source or software under GPL, as it says so clearly in Stallman's license (even if you can fraudulently charge for other services, directly or indirectly related to the software - making those services un-free and unethical - which no one seems to ever acknowledge since only software itself must be ethical (religious cult focus, remember, on a few points - but not the whole picture)).
Free: "With no cost or charge" -- dictionary
This is obvious.

| Home | Stallman Cult | Stallmanism Explanation | Stallmanism (Alternate)
| Free Table Foundation | Free Gardening | Free Hair Dressing | Songs
| Free Books | Free Food | Charge For Source Code
| Free Consulting (hippo critter)
| More Articles | GNG Testimonials | About GNG